##
I have the honour to inform you that I propose to sail to Hong Kong to resume my duties as Assistant Land Office, there on the 11th prox. in S.S. Momorathshire due on the 26 Nov! the date upon which my leave expires.
May I ask if there is any probability of the System of Duty pay given to the Cadets in Hong Kong Civil Service last year being extended to officers like me who are not Cadets, as reasons for giving it to them apply equally to us. We feel the pinch caused by the increasing cost of living and with regard to myself may I remind you that Despatch No 381 & 21 October 1903 lays down that the Assistant Land Officers in the New Territories shall not receive higher pay than the Assistant Land Office, in Hong Kong as their qualification, are equal. The Duty pay Scheme the Assistants Land Officer. In the New Territories (Cadets) now receive £100 per annum (Duty pay) more than I do, a contradiction of the above mentioned ruling which I do not understand.
###
15 September 1912.
| Location | Address | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Plymouth | 3, S. Lawrence Road, Houndiscombe | 16 SEP 12 |
##
The universal application of the duty pay system but it is a sad certainty to introduce it if desirable. In such a case as this, there are difficulties will not arise.
Consider whether the grant of duty pay necessarily involves the point to his Jacks. The question is whether his salary is adequate for the work which he performs. If this is the case, it would be best for the increase to take the form of duty pay.
As at present advised, grant of duty pay is not the case.
###
34437/11 Sir Lugard sheward
GR1178/1922/32(III)
XCR(85)72 is not present in the given text, however 837616 and 381 are present as part of other information.
##
Tell my Jack to reply on the Roman proposal preferring that the Sops does not consider holding £7. which do not bring so strong a case then thought then against the universal application...
Cadet's pay is 2.0... Braut...
RS1 Arr with the that Wisat pupped to the duty they assembly the in the service that he is Cornell 837616 his position.
Sir Lugard
381 & 21 October 1903...had her savetting that
The had
he is
not
In 34437/11 Sir 7
Lugard sheward
não stücke me
£7.
which
do not
bring
so strong
g
then thought
then
agamal
the universal
application of the duty pay
system but
ut-
لا
sad certainty
introduce it if desirable Ather grands, in such an
Casr
as theis
there
the
difficulties will not arise
Tell my Jack
? Reply on the Roman proposes preferal h
can
to for, saying that the
д биб
Sops dors not
Consider
раг
tu
holding
£
as at present advised, grant of duty
that the
the case.
g
Cadeli
the poor ga. 2.0
Braut
necessarily involves the paint
it
to hi Jacks.
Carider is whether
for innimasing
Flee
tieve
quartin to questio
his salay
is grand
L
hing
I wo madequate for the work which be perfoms of this is case
be best for the increase to take
the form of duty por..
RS1
Arr
with the that Wisat pupped to the duty they gmembly the m the service that he is
Cornell 837616
his positio
Sir
30
0.0.
157
3. S. Lawrence Road
Houndiscombe 16 SEP 12.;
Plymath
15 September 1912.
I have the honour to inform you that I propose to sail to Hong Kong to resume my duties as Assistant Land Office, there on the 11th proxe in
S.5. Momenathshire due on the 26 Nor! the date Apon which my leare expires
the
the
that
May lask if there is any probability of the System of Duty pay given to the Cadets in Hong Kong Cirie Service last year being Xtended to officer like me who are not Cadets, as Yeasons for giving it to them apply equally to us. we feet the pinch caused by the increasing cost of living and the high rate of Exchange as much as they do.
hith regard to myself may (remind you with regard 7616. Despatch N 381 & 21 October 1963 lays down that the
Assistant Land Officers in the Nen Verritone shall not receive higher pay than the Assistant Land Office, in Hong Kong as their qualification, are equal. the Duty pay Scheme the Assistants Land Officer. In the New Verritore (Cadets) non reccire ₤100 per (Duty pay) more than I do, a contradiction of the above
mentioned ruling which I do not understand.
21
산
the matter
he needs
but under
arritm
124
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.